Though there try consistent and you may convergent scientific literature towards attachment idea in addition to negative and positive reflexes that secure and vulnerable looks, correspondingly, end in within the marriage, no education were unearthed that in addition checked the brand new details stated into the this research, proving those that dichotomously discriminate the fresh accessory layout including the brand new magnitude regarding discrimination. Differentiating the team away from circumstances you to definitely characterizes all the attachment styles and you will demonstrating hence issues have the finest fuel out-of discrimination might possibly be a relevant result that will point to lookup and you will intervention agendas to have couple psychotherapy.
Inside feel, the purpose of this study was to determine perhaps the interaction, relationship changes, resolution, frequency and you can intensity of issues details perform discriminate people with secure and you can vulnerable accessory inside heterosexual relationships. Therefore, the new theory looked at is actually your bad correspondence, steps of assault and you may avoidance, frequency and you may intensity of disputes details create define https://datingranking.net/nl/whatsyourprice-overzicht/ men since the people with insecure accessory, therefore the unlock interaction, consensus, pleasure, cohesion and you may relationship improvement, therefore the agreement parameters do characterize him or her as people who have secure accessory appearance.
Players
This is exactly a quantitative, cross-sectional data that uses a descriptive and you may explanatory design. Minimal chronilogical age of men individuals try 20 and maximum try 79 (Yards = ; SD = ). Minimal chronilogical age of women users try 18 additionally the restriction is 76 (Meters = ; SD = ) ( Table step one).
Tools
1) Sociodemographic survey: The brand new questionnaire of one’s sociodemographic properties of your users is actually transmitted out as a result of a questionnaire having 14 issues you to investigated: age, intimate orientation, host to quarters, marital position, duration of newest relationships, lives off an earlier matchmaking, duration of earlier dating, degree, doing work outside the home, workload, individual income, level of people and you can faith.
2) Experience in Close Relationship – Reduced (ECR-R-Brazil) ( Natividade Shiramizu, 2015 Natividade, J. C., Shiramizu, V. K. M. (2015). Uma medida de apego: versao brasileira da Experiences in Close Relationship Scale-Reduzida (ECR-R-Brasil). Psicologia USP, 26(3), 484-494. ): The scale assesses the anxiety and avoidance of attachment factors in the marital relationship. The ECR-R-Brazil has affirmative phrases that respondents must categorize on a seven-point Likert scale that ranges from “strongly agree” to seven “strongly disagree”. The scale has ten items, five on the anxiety factor and five on the avoidance factor. In the analysis of the main components of the items of the ECR-R-Brazil carried out in the study by Natividade and Shiramizu (2015) Natividade, J. C., Shiramizu, V. K. M. (2015). Uma medida de apego: versao brasileira da Experiences in Close Relationship Scale-Reduzida (ECR-R-Brasil). Psicologia USP, 26(3), 484-494. , with good data adequacy, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) = 0.80; Bartlett’s sphericity test, ? 2 (66, N = 4.879) = ; p < 0.001. The final model from the confirmatory factor analysis showed an optimal fit, as pointed out in the study: ? 2 = 101.8; Degrees of freedom (df) = 25; p = < 0.001; ? 2 /df = 4.07; Goodness-of-Fit Index (GFI) = 0990; Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index (AGFI) = 0.990; Normed Fit Index (NFI) = 0.990; Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.990; Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.990; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.025; Confidence Interval (CI) = 90%. In this study, the ECR-R-Brazil had a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.64 for men and 0.57 for women.
3) Mosmann, C., Wagner, Good., Sarriera, J. (2008). A beneficial qualidade conjugal como preditora dos estilos educativos parentais. Revista Psicologia Lisboa, 22(2), 161-182. Recuperado de- ): The latest disagreement measure are split into several subscales: in the 1st, named “conflict-disagreement”, 9 goods are exhibited and may be reviewed into the a six-section Likert measure concerning your regularity with which the reasons to own conflict expressed occurred in the past 12 months, ranging from “almost never” so you can half dozen “every time”. In the next subscale, called “conflict-aggression”, around three items are shown talking about the newest concentration of problems, such should be assessed into a good Likert size of 5 points anywhere between “never” to help you four “always”. Regarding study so you can adjust the shape away from English to Portuguese, a beneficial Cronbach’s Leader away from 0.71 are found. Within this study, Cronbach’s opinions had been 0.80 for males and you will 0.77 for females.