In late 2009, Israel issued a muzzle order against the Israeli media reporting the facts surrounding the Anat Kamm-Uri Blau case. The muzzle order was eventually the subject of much criticism and publicity, as the details of the case were reported abroad. The scandal focused on leaked Israel Defense Forces documents suggesting that the army had carried out extrajudicial executions. [14] „Gag Order.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gag%20order. Retrieved 14 January 2022. Dockier, a prominent leader of the Levelers, at the time of the English Commonwealth, was shot dead on government orders. Another type of muzzle order was used for some time by the courts to prevent the press from reporting certain facts about a trial. This muzzle order was made after the 1966 Supreme Court decision in Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 86 p. Ct. 1507, 16 L.
Ed. 2d 600, in which she quashed a criminal conviction on the grounds that pre-trial publicity had unfairly disadvantaged the jury against the accused and deprived him of his right to a fair trial. In a 1976 decision, Nebraska Press Ass`n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539, 96 p. Ct. 2791, 49 L. Ed.
2d 683, the court ruled that the pre-trial muzzle orders for the press were unconstitutional. It found that such orders constituted an unconstitutional prior restriction and violated the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of the press. Police services issue muzzle orders to protect the identity of victims, especially minors, and also to prevent information about ongoing investigations from being known if its publication could pose a threat to the cases or persons involved. In the United States, a court can order parties to a case not to comment on it, but does not have the power to prevent independent journalists from reporting on a case. As a result, information about a case is often leaked to the media, and the media often choose to publicly report that leaked information after receiving it. Most laws restricting what can be reported have generally been found to be unconstitutional and void. However, the gag provisions of the WIPO Copyright Act and the Treaties for the Implementation of Performances and Phonograms were maintained. In August 2017, an Israeli court issued a month-old muzzle order against a state witness case regarding the ongoing criminal investigation against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
n. a court order prohibiting lawyers and parties to an ongoing litigation or lawsuit from speaking about the case to the media or the public. The presumed intention is to prevent prejudice through pre-trial publicity that would influence potential jurors. A secondary purpose of a muzzle order is to prevent lawyers from hearing the case in the press and on television, thereby creating a public atmosphere (which could become ugly) in favour of one party or the other. Based on the First Amendment`s „freedom of the press” provision, the court cannot constitutionally prevent the media from printing or disseminating information about the case, so the only option is to silence those involved under court control. In Canada, however, the media may be restricted, as in a famous case where American newspapers were smuggled across the border to report on a particularly horrific sexual murder case in which a second defendant has yet to be tried. A muzzle order can also be issued by an executive agency, such as when President George Bush issued a muzzle order prohibiting publicly funded health clinics from disclosing information about abortions, a muzzle order that President Bill Clinton lifted on his first day in office. January 22, 1993. And for them to realize their vision, they are ready to use any means. These sample phrases are automatically selected from various online information sources to reflect the current use of the word „gag order”.
The views expressed in the examples do not represent the views of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Send us your feedback. On the thirteenth day of the same month, they tied themselves to the stake to burn alive a man who had two religious in his house. In Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada (1991), the Supreme Court ruled that lawyers who make extrajudicial statements are not entitled to the same level of protection as the media. Muzzle orders to the press are a form of prior coercion and are rarely respected. A company may include muzzle orders in contracts associated with partnerships, employment, and termination to protect trade secrets, intellectual property, sensitive information, and sometimes the company`s reputation. In December 2018, international news sources reported that Cardinal George Pell`s conviction for child abuse was subject to a muzzle order issued by Judge Peter Kidd of Victoria, Australia, to remove coverage of the conviction by the Australian media.
[7] [8] [9] [10] In early February 2019, Victoria`s DPP Kerri Judd QC wrote to approximately 50 Australian press publishers, editors, broadcasters, journalists and sub-editors, accusing them of violating muzzle regulations. Peter Kidd told a closed court that some of the violations were serious and that the editors risked jail. [11] Subscribe to America`s largest dictionary and get thousands of other definitions and advanced searches – ad-free! Judges issue muzzle orders to ensure a fair trial, facilitate the efficient administration of justice and prevent adverse information from entering the jury pool. When prosecutors use the press to send inappropriate documents to jurors in court, such as managing tests or lie detector results, defendants may be denied their right to an impartial jury. A National Security Letter (18 U.S.C. § 2709), an administrative subpoena issued by the FBI, has a muzzle order attached that prevents the recipient from saying anything about a person`s service. [36] The government has issued hundreds of thousands of these NSLs, accompanied by gag orders. The muzzle orders were upheld by the courts. [37] There has been speculation that the MCA may muzzle its press releases before making them public to „ensure maximum effectiveness.” These releases would have to be approved by the president. [17] These claims in the media were later denied. [18] [dead link] In 2015, a Dutch court issued a muzzle order against writer Edwin Giltay, who banned his documentary thriller The Cover-up General and banned him from promoting it.